Child resistant packaging helps prevent accidental access to regulated cannabis products by children while remaining usable for adults. Instead of simple closures, CR designs use intentional opening mechanisms that reduce the chance of misuse.
In this guide, you’ll learn:
• What makes packaging “child resistant” (vs. tamper-evident)
• The most common CR mechanisms used in cannabis packaging
• How CR packaging is typically tested (and what “compliance” really means)
If you want to browse CR formats by product type, see our child resistant packaging overview.
Child resistant packaging is designed to require a combination of actions, strength, coordination, or understanding that is difficult for young children but reasonably manageable for adults. Unlike tamper-evident packaging, child resistant solutions focus on restricting access rather than indicating prior opening.
In regulated cannabis markets, CR requirements typically apply to the outer packaging rather than the product itself.
Different packaging formats use different child resistant mechanisms depending on material, size, and intended use. Below are the most widely adopted mechanisms in cannabis packaging:
Requires users to apply pressure while sliding a tray/panel in a specific direction. This dual-action movement makes it hard for children to open unintentionally.
Common uses: rigid paperboard boxes, drawer boxes for pre-rolls, vape cartridges, and edibles.
Requires pressure at designated points while opening. Without knowing where to squeeze, the package stays locked.
Common uses: child resistant mylar bags and flexible pouch formats.
Requires a sequence of actions (e.g., pushing while turning, aligning components) before opening.
Common uses: plastic containers, jars, and certain tin packaging formats.
Child resistant packaging is typically evaluated through standardized testing protocols. These tests assess whether a sufficient percentage of children cannot open the package within a specified time, while adults can successfully access it.
Child panel: verifies children can’t open it within the test window
Adult panel: verifies adults can open it without unreasonable difficulty
Real-world validation: mechanism needs to hold up during filling, shipping, and retail handling
Important: Passing a test shows a design can meet recognized safety benchmarks, but brands still need proper implementation in production and filling.
Compliance involves more than selecting a closure type. Brands must consider labeling rules, packaging material, production efficiency, and cost — especially when SKUs expand.
Quick compliance checklist:
Mechanism selection matches the product category and target market
Adult usability is acceptable (avoid “too hard to open” complaints)
Labeling/warnings and required symbols have reserved space
Structure can be filled efficiently without damaging the CR function
Packaging can scale as SKUs grow (lead time + consistency)
For a complete overview of compliant packaging formats across vape, pre-roll, edible, and flower products, see our child resistant packaging overview.
Selecting the appropriate CR mechanism depends on product type, target market, and packaging format. Factors such as adult usability, shelf presentation, and future SKU expansion should be evaluated early in development.
Next steps:
• Browse formats: CR packaging collection
• Get a recommendation: Request a Quote
